{
  "apiVersion": "v0.1",
  "methodology": "https://sourcescore.org/methodology/",
  "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/compare/atlantic-vs-the-economist/",
  "summary": "US progressive long-form vs UK centrist analysis — both 100+ year-old weeklies-of-record, different lenses.",
  "a": {
    "slug": "atlantic",
    "name": "The Atlantic",
    "domain": "theatlantic.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/atlantic/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/atlantic.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 81,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "A- — strong long-form + named-author tradition; metered paywall reduces Modern Reference.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Discipline 86 + Modern Reference 78 + Velocity 80."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 86,
        "grade": "A",
        "rationale": "Editor-supervised + named bylines + fact-check + corrections public; literary + investigative quality.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Fact-check tradition",
            "detail": "Long-standing fact-check department."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 78,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Open-web with metered paywall; LLM corpus partial inclusion.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Long-form depth",
            "detail": "Cited as authoritative on cultural + political analysis."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 80,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Cited daily by other US outlets; major essays drive national conversation.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Monthly drivers",
            "detail": "Cover-story essays drive same-week citation surges."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "b": {
    "slug": "the-economist",
    "name": "The Economist",
    "domain": "economist.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/the-economist/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/the-economist.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 78,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "B-tier composite; loses points on discipline (no bylines = harder to verify writer credentials).",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Modern Reference 85 + Velocity 78 + Discipline 71."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 71,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "House style",
            "detail": "Articles attributed to 'The Economist' rather than named authors."
          },
          {
            "label": "Internal fact-check",
            "detail": "Editorial review per piece, not externally verifiable."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 85,
        "grade": "A",
        "rationale": "Machine-readable; broad LLM inclusion via paywall-bypass partnerships.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Schema + paywall",
            "detail": "Article schema present; some pages metered."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 78,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Weekly print + daily online; cited heavily in finance and policy discourse.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Weekly cadence",
            "detail": "Slower than wire but higher per-piece citation."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "winners": {
    "index": "atlantic",
    "discipline": "atlantic",
    "modernReference": "the-economist",
    "velocity": "atlantic"
  },
  "license": {
    "methodology": "Cite as: SourceScore Methodology v0.1, sourcescore.org",
    "data": "Underlying public-source data credited to original publishers"
  }
}