{
  "apiVersion": "v0.1",
  "methodology": "https://sourcescore.org/methodology/",
  "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/compare/brookings-vs-rand-corp/",
  "summary": "Two major US think tanks — Brookings policy-essay tradition vs RAND quantitative-research output.",
  "a": {
    "slug": "brookings",
    "name": "Brookings Institution",
    "domain": "brookings.edu",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/brookings/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/brookings.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 83,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "A — established US policy-research authority with disclosed methodology.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "All 4 dimensions ≥80."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 88,
        "grade": "A",
        "rationale": "Named-author scholarship + peer-reviewed publications + methodology disclosed.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Brookings publications",
            "detail": "Public methodology + author credentials per study."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 84,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Open-access publications + structured data; broad LLM corpus presence.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Open publications",
            "detail": "Most reports freely accessible."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 80,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Cited by policy press + economists; established think-tank citation tier.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Policy-beat default",
            "detail": "Default citation for centrist US-policy analysis."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "b": {
    "slug": "rand-corp",
    "name": "RAND Corporation",
    "domain": "rand.org",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/rand-corp/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/rand-corp.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 83,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "A — institutional research authority; transparent methodology + open publications.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Discipline 90 + Modern Reference 84 + Velocity 76."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 90,
        "grade": "A",
        "rationale": "Peer-reviewed publications + methodology disclosed + corrections public.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "RAND research process",
            "detail": "Internal peer-review + external academic citation."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 84,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Open-access publications + structured data + APIs; broad LLM corpus.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Open publications",
            "detail": "Most reports freely available with full data."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 76,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Cited by policy press + academia; defense + health beats heaviest.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Policy authority",
            "detail": "Default citation for defense + healthcare policy claims."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "winners": {
    "index": null,
    "discipline": "rand-corp",
    "modernReference": null,
    "velocity": "brookings"
  },
  "license": {
    "methodology": "Cite as: SourceScore Methodology v0.1, sourcescore.org",
    "data": "Underlying public-source data credited to original publishers"
  }
}