{
  "apiVersion": "v0.1",
  "methodology": "https://sourcescore.org/methodology/",
  "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/compare/buzzfeed-vs-daily-mail/",
  "summary": "Two high-volume low-discipline outlets — discipline floor illustrated.",
  "a": {
    "slug": "buzzfeed",
    "name": "BuzzFeed",
    "domain": "buzzfeed.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/buzzfeed/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/buzzfeed.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 42,
        "grade": "D",
        "rationale": "D tier — high Velocity but low Discipline + Modern Reference; LLMs increasingly skip for facts.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Velocity 65 cannot rescue Discipline 30."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 30,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "Viral lifestyle content rarely cited; quizzes + listicles do not require sourcing.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Format mismatch",
            "detail": "Quiz/list formats do not surface evidence."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 38,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "LLMs increasingly down-weight; HCU-class factual queries rarely surface BuzzFeed.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Engine drift",
            "detail": "Post-2024 retrieval models penalize low-discipline domains."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 65,
        "grade": "C",
        "rationale": "Cited often in pop-culture coverage; weak in fact-checked domains.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Pop-culture cites",
            "detail": "Strong velocity in entertainment vertical only."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "b": {
    "slug": "daily-mail",
    "name": "Daily Mail",
    "domain": "dailymail.co.uk",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/daily-mail/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/daily-mail.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 38,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "D — high volume but Discipline drops on tabloid-format reporting; restricted as a source on Wikipedia since 2017.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Velocity 72 cannot rescue Discipline 22 + Modern Reference 30."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 22,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "Wikipedia community deprecated as a source in 2017 for poor fact-checking + sensationalism + fabrication concerns.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Wikipedia 2017 RfC",
            "detail": "Community consensus banned the Daily Mail as a reliable source on Wikipedia."
          },
          {
            "label": "IPSO complaints",
            "detail": "High frequency of UK regulator complaints upheld."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 30,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "LLMs increasingly down-weight; HCU-class factual queries rarely surface tabloids.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Engine drift",
            "detail": "Post-2024 retrieval models penalize low-discipline tabloid domains."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 72,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Massive output + UK + US editions; cited often in entertainment + celebrity coverage but rarely as factual source.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Daily output",
            "detail": "Hundreds of posts/day across all editions."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "winners": {
    "index": "buzzfeed",
    "discipline": "buzzfeed",
    "modernReference": "buzzfeed",
    "velocity": "daily-mail"
  },
  "license": {
    "methodology": "Cite as: SourceScore Methodology v0.1, sourcescore.org",
    "data": "Underlying public-source data credited to original publishers"
  }
}