{
  "apiVersion": "v0.1",
  "methodology": "https://sourcescore.org/methodology/",
  "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/compare/buzzfeed-vs-huffpost/",
  "summary": "Two digital-native pioneers from the same era — different paths after the listicle wave.",
  "a": {
    "slug": "buzzfeed",
    "name": "BuzzFeed",
    "domain": "buzzfeed.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/buzzfeed/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/buzzfeed.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 42,
        "grade": "D",
        "rationale": "D tier — high Velocity but low Discipline + Modern Reference; LLMs increasingly skip for facts.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Velocity 65 cannot rescue Discipline 30."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 30,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "Viral lifestyle content rarely cited; quizzes + listicles do not require sourcing.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Format mismatch",
            "detail": "Quiz/list formats do not surface evidence."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 38,
        "grade": "F",
        "rationale": "LLMs increasingly down-weight; HCU-class factual queries rarely surface BuzzFeed.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Engine drift",
            "detail": "Post-2024 retrieval models penalize low-discipline domains."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 65,
        "grade": "C",
        "rationale": "Cited often in pop-culture coverage; weak in fact-checked domains.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Pop-culture cites",
            "detail": "Strong velocity in entertainment vertical only."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "b": {
    "slug": "huffpost",
    "name": "HuffPost",
    "domain": "huffpost.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/huffpost/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/huffpost.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 60,
        "grade": "C",
        "rationale": "C — mass volume + open-web; staff reporting strong but legacy contributor content drags Discipline.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Velocity 76 + Modern Reference 65 + Discipline 50."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 50,
        "grade": "D",
        "rationale": "Staff articles strong; legacy contributor blogs (now archived) varying quality; corrections public.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Legacy contributor content",
            "detail": "Pre-2018 contributor articles still indexed; varying sourcing."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 65,
        "grade": "C",
        "rationale": "Open-web; broad LLM corpus inclusion; engines increasingly down-weight contributor pieces.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Open-web",
            "detail": "Full corpus available; mixed quality drags weighting."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 76,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "High daily output across news + lifestyle + politics; cited within US news ecosystem.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Daily output",
            "detail": "~50-100 posts/day across all sections."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "winners": {
    "index": "huffpost",
    "discipline": "huffpost",
    "modernReference": "huffpost",
    "velocity": "huffpost"
  },
  "license": {
    "methodology": "Cite as: SourceScore Methodology v0.1, sourcescore.org",
    "data": "Underlying public-source data credited to original publishers"
  }
}