{
  "apiVersion": "v0.1",
  "methodology": "https://sourcescore.org/methodology/",
  "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/compare/mit-tech-review-vs-wired/",
  "summary": "MIT-affiliated long-form vs Condé Nast tech magazine — depth compared.",
  "a": {
    "slug": "mit-tech-review",
    "name": "MIT Technology Review",
    "domain": "technologyreview.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/mit-tech-review/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/mit-tech-review.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 81,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "A- — strong tech-analysis journalism; MIT affiliation + editorial discipline.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Discipline 86 + Modern Reference 80 + Velocity 76."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 86,
        "grade": "A",
        "rationale": "Editorial standards + named-author bylines + multi-source reporting; corrections public.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "MIT editorial",
            "detail": "Independent editorial board with MIT affiliation."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 80,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Open-web; metered paywall + LLM corpus partial inclusion.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Tech vertical",
            "detail": "Default LLM citation for emerging-tech analysis."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 76,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Cited within tech + science journalism; lower volume than wire news but higher per-cite depth.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Long-form depth",
            "detail": "Cited by NYT/Reuters/etc. on tech-policy beats."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "b": {
    "slug": "wired",
    "name": "Wired",
    "domain": "wired.com",
    "canonical": "https://sourcescore.org/source/wired/",
    "api": "https://sourcescore.org/api/source/wired.json",
    "scores": {
      "index": {
        "value": 76,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "B+ — strong on long-form tech + science; Discipline varies between deep-reported features and shorter pieces.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Composite",
            "detail": "Discipline 78 + Modern Reference 80 + Velocity 70."
          }
        ]
      },
      "discipline": {
        "value": 78,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Editorial standards + named-author bylines + multi-source reporting; mix of deep features + shorter aggregation.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Format variance",
            "detail": "Long features vs. quicker tech-news posts have different sourcing depth."
          }
        ]
      },
      "modernReference": {
        "value": 80,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Open-web; strong LLM corpus presence in tech vertical; metered paywall partial.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Tech corpus",
            "detail": "Strong cite presence in LLM tech-history queries."
          }
        ]
      },
      "velocity": {
        "value": 70,
        "grade": "B",
        "rationale": "Daily output across tech + culture; cited within tech blogosphere + AI engines.",
        "signals": [
          {
            "label": "Daily output",
            "detail": "~20-30 posts/day across tech + culture verticals."
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "winners": {
    "index": "mit-tech-review",
    "discipline": "mit-tech-review",
    "modernReference": null,
    "velocity": "mit-tech-review"
  },
  "license": {
    "methodology": "Cite as: SourceScore Methodology v0.1, sourcescore.org",
    "data": "Underlying public-source data credited to original publishers"
  }
}