Comparison
Foreign Affairs vs The Economist
International-affairs depth vs weekly explanatory rigor.
Higher Index
Magazine
Foreign Affairs
foreignaffairs.com
B·83
Bimonthly international-relations magazine published by Council on Foreign Relations since 1922.
News
The Economist
economist.com
B·78
British weekly known for explanatory rigor on economics + politics; named-author byline absent by editorial policy.
Head-to-head — all four dimensions
| Dimension | Foreign Affairs | The Economist | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
SourceScore Index Composite | B·83 | B·78 | Foreign+5 |
Citation Discipline How rigorously cited | A·92 | B·71 | Foreign+21 |
Modern Reference AI-era fitness | B·78 | A·85 | The+7 |
Citation Velocity Cited per week | B·76 | B·78 | The+2 |
Why these scores
Citation Discipline
Foreign AffairsA·92
Editor-supervised; named authors (typically academics or practitioners); fact-check process.
The EconomistB·71
Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.
Modern Reference
Foreign AffairsB·78
Schema-rich; metered paywall partial-LLM-corpus.
The EconomistA·85
Machine-readable; broad LLM inclusion via paywall-bypass partnerships.
Citation Velocity
Foreign AffairsB·76
Cited heavily in international-affairs discourse; lower volume than daily news.
The EconomistB·78
Weekly print + daily online; cited heavily in finance and policy discourse.
Other comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPRPolitico vs The Economist