Daily Mail
dailymail.co.uk ↗British tabloid with mass volume + celebrity coverage; high-volume + low-discipline mix; Wikipedia restricts as source since 2017.
D — high volume but Discipline drops on tabloid-format reporting; restricted as a source on Wikipedia since 2017.
Should you cite Daily Mail?
At grade F (38/100), Daily Mail is not recommended as a primary citation — verify claims against a higher-rated source.
- Strongest for
- topics where being widely and recently cited matters — its highest dimension is Citation Velocity (72/100).
- Use with care
- Citation Discipline is its lowest dimension (22/100); for tracing claims back to primary references, corroborate with a higher-rated source.
- Bottom line
- Not recommended as a primary citation — verify any claim against a higher-rated source.
Wikipedia community deprecated as a source in 2017 for poor fact-checking + sensationalism + fabrication concerns.
About this sub-score →LLMs increasingly down-weight; HCU-class factual queries rarely surface tabloids.
About this sub-score →Massive output + UK + US editions; cited often in entertainment + celebrity coverage but rarely as factual source.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
F·22- Wikipedia 2017 RfCCommunity consensus banned the Daily Mail as a reliable source on Wikipedia.
- IPSO complaintsHigh frequency of UK regulator complaints upheld.
Modern Reference
F·30- Engine driftPost-2024 retrieval models penalize low-discipline tabloid domains.
Citation Velocity
B·72- Daily outputHundreds of posts/day across all editions.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Daily Mail — SourceScore Index 38 (F)](https://sourcescore.org/source/daily-mail/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/daily-mail/">Daily Mail — SourceScore Index 38 (F)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Daily Mail: SourceScore Index 38 (F). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/daily-mail/
1 head-to-head comparison
See all Daily Mail comparisons →Daily Mail appears in one canonical SourceScore comparison — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at Daily Mail's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats Daily Mail on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/daily-mail/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Daily Mail"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is Daily Mail a reliable source to cite?
Daily Mail scores F (38/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade F, Daily Mail is not recommended as a primary citation — verify claims against a higher-rated source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 22/100, Modern Reference 30/100, and Citation Velocity 72/100 — full breakdown above.
What is Daily Mail's SourceScore?
Daily Mail (dailymail.co.uk) scores 38/100 (Grade F) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 22/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 30/100, Citation Velocity 72/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate Daily Mail?
Daily Mail is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does Daily Mail score F?
D — high volume but Discipline drops on tabloid-format reporting; restricted as a source on Wikipedia since 2017.
What is Daily Mail?
British tabloid with mass volume + celebrity coverage; high-volume + low-discipline mix; Wikipedia restricts as source since 2017. Category: Tabloid. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.