Verified claim · AI-ML · 100% confidence
SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues.
Last verified 2026-05-16 · Methodology veritas-v0.1 · b16b5f5297e5f621
SourceScore rates how reliable a source is to cite — for AI answers and research. This is one verified claim from the catalog.
Related verified claims
More verified claims related to this one — keep exploring.
Chatbot Arena introduced in: Zheng et al. 2023 — LMSYS open platform for evaluating LLMs by human preference.
100% confidence · shares 3 tags (evaluation, 2023, introduced_in)
AlpacaEval introduced in: Li et al. 2023 — LLM-as-judge evaluation benchmark.
100% confidence · shares 3 tags (evaluation, 2023, introduced_in)
Tree of Thoughts introduced in: Yao et al. 2023 — deliberate problem solving with LLMs.
100% confidence · shares 3 tags (princeton, 2023, introduced_in)
MTEB benchmark introduced in: Muennighoff et al. 2022 — Massive Text Embedding Benchmark.
100% confidence · shares 3 tags (benchmark, evaluation, introduced_in)
LMArena (Chatbot Arena) founded in: 2023 — LMSYS Chatbot Arena → LMArena.ai 2024.
100% confidence · shares 3 tags (evaluation, benchmark, 2023)
LongBench introduced in paper: LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding (Bai et al., THU + Zhipu AI 2023-08-28).
100% confidence · shares 3 tags (benchmark, evaluation, 2023)
GPQA benchmark introduced in paper: GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark (Rein et al., 2023).
92% confidence · shares 3 tags (benchmark, evaluation, 2023)
MMLU benchmark introduced in paper: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding (Hendrycks et al., 2020).
100% confidence · shares 2 tags (benchmark, evaluation)
Structured fields
- Subject
- SWE-bench
- Predicate
introduced_in- Object
- Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues
- Confidence
- 100%
- Tags
- swe-bench · princeton · benchmark · coding · evaluation · introduced_in · 2023
Sources (2)
[1] preprint · arXiv (Jimenez, Yang, Wettig, Yao, Pei, Press, Narasimhan / Princeton + Chicago) · 2023-10-10
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?“Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed.”
[2] official blog · SWE-bench team · 2024-01-01
SWE-bench — official benchmark site
Cite this claim
Ready-to-paste citation (Markdown / plain text):
SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues. — SourceScore Claim b16b5f5297e5f621 (verified 2026-05-16). https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.jsonEmbed this claim
Drop this iframe into any blog post, docs page, or knowledge base. The widget renders the claim record + top cited source + click-through to this canonical page. CC-BY 4.0; attribution included.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/claim/b16b5f5297e5f621/" width="100%" height="360" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues."></iframe>Preview: open in new tab
Frequently asked questions
How has SourceScore reviewed the claim "SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues."?
SourceScore records this assertion with 100% legacy editorial confidence as of 2026-05-16, under methodology veritas-v0.1. That metadata is not a truth guarantee. Inspect the 2 cited source record(s), excerpts, and live evidence below.
What is the evidence for "SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues."?
The record lists 2 cited source(s): arXiv (Jimenez, Yang, Wettig, Yao, Pei, Press, Narasimhan / Princeton + Chicago), SWE-bench team. Each is shown below with a short excerpt and URL. The JSON record at https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.json includes SourceScore-issued HMAC integrity metadata, not a public verification proof.
When was this claim record last reviewed by SourceScore?
Last reviewed 2026-05-16 under methodology version veritas-v0.1. The dated JSON record includes SourceScore-issued HMAC metadata, which is not publicly recomputable. Refetch the record and inspect current evidence before relying on it.
How can I cite this SourceScore claim in my code or article?
Fetch the JSON record from https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.json, including the verbatim claim, cited evidence, confidence, methodology version, and last-verified date. Refetch the canonical HTTPS record and inspect cited evidence; the HMAC tag is not publicly independently verifiable. The CC-BY-4.0 license permits commercial use with attribution to SourceScore.
Use this claim in your code
Fetch this record from your application. The response includes verbatim excerpts, primary-source URLs, and SourceScore-issued HMAC integrity metadata. Refetch the canonical HTTPS record and inspect cited evidence; public users cannot independently verify the HMAC tag.
cURL
curl https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.jsonJavaScript / TypeScript
const r = await fetch("https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.json");
const envelope = await r.json();
console.log(envelope.claim.statement);
// "SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues."Python
import httpx
r = httpx.get("https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.json")
envelope = r.json()
print(envelope["claim"]["statement"])
# "SWE-bench introduced in: Jimenez et al. 2024 — software engineering benchmark from GitHub issues."LangChain (retrieve-then-cite)
from langchain_core.tools import tool
import httpx
@tool
def get_swe_bench_fact() -> dict:
"""Fetch the verified SourceScore claim for SWE-bench."""
r = httpx.get("https://sourcescore.org/api/v1/claims/b16b5f5297e5f621.json")
return r.json()