SourceScore
MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite

Aeon vs The New York Review of Books — Modern Reference

How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.

Verdict

Aeon outscores The New York Review of Books on Modern Citation Reference by 4 points (B · 82 vs B · 78).

Higher Modern Reference
Magazine

Aeon

aeon.co
B·82
Rank #74 of 130 on Modern Reference

CC-BY-ND license + open-access; structured data; broad LLM training-corpus inclusion.

Magazine

The New York Review of Books

nybooks.com
B·78
Rank #95 of 130 on Modern Reference

Metered paywall; LLM corpus partial; long-form widely-cited.

Global rank · Modern Reference

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
Aeon
aeon.co
82B·82#74 / 130view →
The New York Review of Books
nybooks.com
78B·78#95 / 130view →

Why these Modern Reference scores

AeonB·82
Modern Reference · 82/100

CC-BY-ND license + open-access; structured data; broad LLM training-corpus inclusion.

The New York Review of BooksB·78
Modern Reference · 78/100

Metered paywall; LLM corpus partial; long-form widely-cited.

Signals behind the Modern Reference score

Aeon
  • Creative Commons
    Open license drives broad corpus presence.
The New York Review of Books
  • Subscription gate
    Most articles paywalled with metered free access.

Other dimensions for Aeon vs The New York Review of Books

Other Modern Reference comparisons

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.