SourceScore
MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite

arXiv vs PubMed — Modern Reference

How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.

Verdict

arXiv outscores PubMed on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).

Higher Modern Reference
Academic

arXiv

arxiv.org
A+·95
Rank #3 of 130 on Modern Reference

DOI + arxiv ID + free PDFs + bulk APIs; among the most LLM-cited sources for technical content.

Academic

PubMed

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A·92
Rank #12 of 130 on Modern Reference

E-utilities API + free full-text search + bulk dataset downloads; broad LLM corpus inclusion.

Global rank · Modern Reference

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
arXiv
arxiv.org
95A+·95#3 / 130view →
PubMed
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
92A·92#12 / 130view →

Why these Modern Reference scores

arXivA+·95
Modern Reference · 95/100

DOI + arxiv ID + free PDFs + bulk APIs; among the most LLM-cited sources for technical content.

PubMedA·92
Modern Reference · 92/100

E-utilities API + free full-text search + bulk dataset downloads; broad LLM corpus inclusion.

Signals behind the Modern Reference score

arXiv
  • API + bulk export
    OAI-PMH + Kaggle bulk dump used by every major LLM.
  • Stable URL pattern
    arxiv.org/abs/<ID> permanent; doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.<ID>.
PubMed
  • Entrez E-utilities
    Public REST API for programmatic access.

Other dimensions for arXiv vs PubMed

SourceScore Index
Composite head-to-head — PubMed leads
Discipline
PubMed +18 pts
Velocity
PubMed +1 pts

Other Modern Reference comparisons

Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPRPolitico vs The Economist