SourceScore
DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite

arXiv vs PubMed — Discipline

How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.

Verdict

PubMed outscores arXiv on Citation Discipline by 18 points (A+ · 96 vs B · 78).

Academic

arXiv

arxiv.org
B·78
Rank #108 of 130 on Discipline

Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.

Higher Discipline
Academic

PubMed

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A+·96
Rank #3 of 130 on Discipline

Indexes peer-reviewed literature only; MeSH controlled-vocabulary tagging maintained by NLM staff.

Global rank · Discipline

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
arXiv
arxiv.org
78B·78#108 / 130view →
PubMed
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
96A+·96#3 / 130view →

Why these Discipline scores

arXivB·78
Discipline · 78/100

Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.

PubMedA+·96
Discipline · 96/100

Indexes peer-reviewed literature only; MeSH controlled-vocabulary tagging maintained by NLM staff.

Signals behind the Discipline score

arXiv
  • Endorsement system
    New submitters need an endorsement from an established author.
  • Pre-peer-review
    Papers may be revised, retracted, or never published in journals.
PubMed
  • MeSH headings
    Subject indexing curated by NLM editorial staff.
  • Peer review filter
    Only journals passing NLM selection criteria are indexed.

Other dimensions for arXiv vs PubMed

Other Discipline comparisons

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.