DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
arXiv vs PubMed — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
PubMed outscores arXiv on Citation Discipline by 18 points (A+ · 96 vs B · 78).
Academic
arXiv
arxiv.org
B·78
Rank #108 of 130 on Discipline
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
Higher Discipline
Academic
PubMed
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A+·96
Rank #3 of 130 on Discipline
Indexes peer-reviewed literature only; MeSH controlled-vocabulary tagging maintained by NLM staff.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
arXivB·78
Discipline · 78/100
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
PubMedA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Indexes peer-reviewed literature only; MeSH controlled-vocabulary tagging maintained by NLM staff.
Signals behind the Discipline score
arXiv
- Endorsement systemNew submitters need an endorsement from an established author.
- Pre-peer-reviewPapers may be revised, retracted, or never published in journals.
PubMed
- MeSH headingsSubject indexing curated by NLM editorial staff.
- Peer review filterOnly journals passing NLM selection criteria are indexed.
Other dimensions for arXiv vs PubMed
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPRPolitico vs The Economist