SourceScore
DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite

Encyclopædia Britannica vs Wikipedia (English) — Discipline

How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.

Verdict

Wikipedia (English) outscores Encyclopædia Britannica on Citation Discipline by 4 points (A+ · 96 vs A · 92).

Reference

Encyclopædia Britannica

britannica.com
A·92
Rank #35 of 130 on Discipline

Editor-supervised; named expert contributors; editorial-board fact-check; corrections logged.

Higher Discipline
Reference

Wikipedia (English)

en.wikipedia.org
A+·96
Rank #2 of 130 on Discipline

Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.

Global rank · Discipline

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
Encyclopædia Britannica
britannica.com
92A·92#35 / 130view →
Wikipedia (English)
en.wikipedia.org
96A+·96#2 / 130view →

Why these Discipline scores

Encyclopædia BritannicaA·92
Discipline · 92/100

Editor-supervised; named expert contributors; editorial-board fact-check; corrections logged.

Wikipedia (English)A+·96
Discipline · 96/100

Inline citations required by editorial policy on every factual claim; uncited claims tagged within hours.

Signals behind the Discipline score

Encyclopædia Britannica
  • Editorial board
    Subject-area editors review every entry.
  • Named contributors
    Articles signed by experts with credentials disclosed.
Wikipedia (English)
  • WP:V (Verifiability)
    Core policy mandates reliable sources.
  • Citation needed tag
    Active triage process surfaces gaps publicly.

Other dimensions for Encyclopædia Britannica vs Wikipedia (English)

Other Discipline comparisons

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.