arXiv
arxiv.org ↗Open-access preprint server for physics, mathematics, computer science; ~2.4M papers since 1991.
A — strong corpus presence + machine-readable archive; lower discipline because preprints aren't peer-reviewed.
Should you cite arXiv?
At grade A (89/100), arXiv ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- AI-era retrieval and current-topic queries — its highest dimension is Modern Reference (95/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Discipline, scores 78/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Moderation-only filter (not peer-review). Endorsement system catches obvious quality issues; substantive review is downstream.
About this sub-score →DOI + arxiv ID + free PDFs + bulk APIs; among the most LLM-cited sources for technical content.
About this sub-score →Cited daily by ML/AI papers; default reference for current AI research; ChatGPT/Claude pull arxiv frequently.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
B·78- Endorsement systemNew submitters need an endorsement from an established author.
- Pre-peer-reviewPapers may be revised, retracted, or never published in journals.
Modern Reference
A+·95- API + bulk exportOAI-PMH + Kaggle bulk dump used by every major LLM.
- Stable URL patternarxiv.org/abs/<ID> permanent; doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.<ID>.
Citation Velocity
A·93- AI research velocityMost-cited venue for AI/ML preprints in 2024-2026.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[arXiv — SourceScore Index 89 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/arxiv/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/arxiv/">arXiv — SourceScore Index 89 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). arXiv: SourceScore Index 89 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/arxiv/
3 head-to-head comparisons
See all arXiv comparisons →arXiv appears in 3 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at arXiv's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats arXiv on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/arxiv/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: arXiv"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is arXiv a reliable source to cite?
arXiv scores A (89/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, arXiv ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 78/100, Modern Reference 95/100, and Citation Velocity 93/100 — full breakdown above.
What is arXiv's SourceScore?
arXiv (arxiv.org) scores 89/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 78/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 95/100, Citation Velocity 93/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate arXiv?
arXiv is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does arXiv score A?
A — strong corpus presence + machine-readable archive; lower discipline because preprints aren't peer-reviewed.
What is arXiv?
Open-access preprint server for physics, mathematics, computer science; ~2.4M papers since 1991. Category: Academic. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.