VELOCITY · 35% of composite
Aeon vs Quanta Magazine — Velocity
How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.
Verdict
Quanta Magazine outscores Aeon on Citation Velocity by 10 points (B · 80 vs B · 70).
Magazine
Aeon
aeon.co
B·70
Rank #124 of 130 on Velocity
Cited within philosophy + culture discourse; specialist long-form authority.
Higher Velocity
Magazine
Quanta Magazine
quantamagazine.org
B·80
Rank #63 of 130 on Velocity
Cited by science press + academics; specialist science journalism authority.
Global rank · Velocity
Why these Velocity scores
AeonB·70
Velocity · 70/100
Cited within philosophy + culture discourse; specialist long-form authority.
Quanta MagazineB·80
Velocity · 80/100
Cited by science press + academics; specialist science journalism authority.
Signals behind the Velocity score
Aeon
- Long-form authorityCited by other long-form publications.
Quanta Magazine
- Science-journalism authorityDefault citation for advanced math + physics explainers.
Other dimensions for Aeon vs Quanta Magazine
Other Velocity comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Aeon (aeon.co) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Quanta Magazine (quantamagazine.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/aeon-vs-quanta-magazine/velocity.json