SourceScore
VELOCITY · 35% of composite

Harvard Business Review vs The Economist — Velocity

How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.

By Published by Caslon MediaScored against methodology v0.1Scores last verified
Verdict

The Economist outscores Harvard Business Review on Citation Velocity by 2 points (B · 78 vs B · 76).

Magazine

Harvard Business Review

hbr.org
B·76
Rank #93 of 130 on Velocity

Cited within business + management discourse; weekly cadence.

Higher Velocity
News

The Economist

economist.com
B·78
Rank #73 of 130 on Velocity

Weekly print + daily online; cited heavily in finance and policy discourse.

Global rank · Velocity

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
Harvard Business Review
hbr.org
76B·76#93 / 130view →
The Economist
economist.com
78B·78#73 / 130view →

Why these Velocity scores

Harvard Business ReviewB·76
Velocity · 76/100

Cited within business + management discourse; weekly cadence.

The EconomistB·78
Velocity · 78/100

Weekly print + daily online; cited heavily in finance and policy discourse.

Signals behind the Velocity score

Harvard Business Review
  • Business-school standard
    Default citation in MBA + executive-education.
The Economist
  • Weekly cadence
    Slower than wire but higher per-piece citation.

Other dimensions for Harvard Business Review vs The Economist

SourceScore Index
Composite head-to-head — Harvard Business Review leads
Discipline
Harvard Business Review +15 pts
Modern Reference
The Economist +7 pts

Other Velocity comparisons

Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.