SourceScore
VELOCITY · 35% of composite

London Review of Books vs The New Yorker — Velocity

How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.

By Published by Caslon MediaScored against methodology v0.1Scores last verified
Verdict

London Review of Books and The New Yorker tie on Citation Velocity (B · 80).

Magazine

London Review of Books

lrb.co.uk
B·80
Rank #64 of 130 on Velocity

Cited by literary + cultural press + academics; bi-weekly cadence.

Magazine

The New Yorker

newyorker.com
B·80
Rank #59 of 130 on Velocity

Cited weekly + on major investigative drops; cultural-conversation setting.

Global rank · Velocity

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
London Review of Books
lrb.co.uk
80B·80#64 / 130view →
The New Yorker
newyorker.com
80B·80#59 / 130view →

Why these Velocity scores

London Review of BooksB·80
Velocity · 80/100

Cited by literary + cultural press + academics; bi-weekly cadence.

The New YorkerB·80
Velocity · 80/100

Cited weekly + on major investigative drops; cultural-conversation setting.

Signals behind the Velocity score

London Review of Books
  • Literary-review default
    Default citation for UK cultural-criticism essays.
The New Yorker
  • Investigative drops
    Major investigations drive same-day global citation.

Other dimensions for London Review of Books vs The New Yorker

SourceScore Index
Composite head-to-head — London Review of Books leads
Discipline
tie (90)
Modern Reference
tie (78)

Other Velocity comparisons

Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.