Anthropic Research
anthropic.com ↗AI safety research lab publishing technical papers + safety research + Claude model documentation.
A — top-tier AI lab with peer-reviewed publications + interpretability + safety research.
Should you cite Anthropic Research?
At grade B (82/100), Anthropic Research is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- AI-era retrieval and current-topic queries — its highest dimension is Modern Reference (88/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 72/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Peer-review + open arxiv preprints + methodology disclosed; corrections public.
About this sub-score →Open papers + model cards + research blog; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
About this sub-score →Cited within AI research + tech press; growing share of citation in AI/safety space.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·86- Open-research practiceMost papers preprinted to arxiv.
Modern Reference
A·88- Research transparencyDetailed model cards + safety-research disclosure.
Citation Velocity
B·72- AI-research citationFrequently cited by current AI/safety papers.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Anthropic Research — SourceScore Index 82 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/anthropic-research/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/anthropic-research/">Anthropic Research — SourceScore Index 82 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Anthropic Research: SourceScore Index 82 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/anthropic-research/
3 head-to-head comparisons
See all Anthropic Research comparisons →Anthropic Research appears in 3 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at Anthropic Research's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats Anthropic Research on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/anthropic-research/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Anthropic Research"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic Research a reliable source to cite?
Anthropic Research scores B (82/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, Anthropic Research is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference 88/100, and Citation Velocity 72/100 — full breakdown above.
What is Anthropic Research's SourceScore?
Anthropic Research (anthropic.com) scores 82/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 88/100, Citation Velocity 72/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate Anthropic Research?
Anthropic Research is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does Anthropic Research score B?
A — top-tier AI lab with peer-reviewed publications + interpretability + safety research.
What is Anthropic Research?
AI safety research lab publishing technical papers + safety research + Claude model documentation. Category: Academic. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.