eLife
elifesciences.org ↗Open-access peer-reviewed life-sciences journal; transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published).
A — open-access + transparent peer-review; growing citation share in biology.
Should you cite eLife?
At grade B (83/100), eLife is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (90/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 72/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published); preprint-first model since 2022.
About this sub-score →CC-BY licensed; APIs + bulk corpus; broad LLM training-data inclusion.
About this sub-score →Cited within life-sciences research; lower volume than NEJM/Lancet but high open-access reach.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·90- Public peer reviewReviewer comments + author responses published with article.
Modern Reference
A·88- Creative CommonsOpen license enables broad LLM usage.
Citation Velocity
B·72- Open-access reachStrong cite presence in LLM biology queries.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[eLife — SourceScore Index 83 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/elife/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/elife/">eLife — SourceScore Index 83 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). eLife: SourceScore Index 83 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/elife/
1 head-to-head comparison
See all eLife comparisons →eLife appears in one canonical SourceScore comparison — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at eLife's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats eLife on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/elife/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: eLife"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is eLife a reliable source to cite?
eLife scores B (83/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, eLife is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference 88/100, and Citation Velocity 72/100 — full breakdown above.
What is eLife's SourceScore?
eLife (elifesciences.org) scores 83/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 88/100, Citation Velocity 72/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate eLife?
eLife is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does eLife score B?
A — open-access + transparent peer-review; growing citation share in biology.
What is eLife?
Open-access peer-reviewed life-sciences journal; transparent peer-review (reviewer notes published). Category: Academic. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.