Financial Times
ft.com ↗British business + economics daily; rigorous editorial process; pink-paper standard for finance reporting.
A — top-tier business journalism; paywall reduces Modern Reference somewhat.
Should you cite Financial Times?
At grade B (84/100), Financial Times is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (88/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Modern Reference, scores 78/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Editorial Code public; multi-source verification; corrections discipline.
About this sub-score →Hard paywall reduces full-corpus availability; but B2B partnerships + summaries leak into LLM training.
About this sub-score →Cited daily in finance reporting; markets move on FT exclusives.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·88- FT Editorial CodePublic policy on accuracy + sourcing standards.
Modern Reference
B·78- Subscription gateMost articles paywalled; smaller training-corpus footprint.
Citation Velocity
A·86- Finance verticalDefault citation for European markets + economics coverage.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[Financial Times — SourceScore Index 84 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/ft/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/ft/">Financial Times — SourceScore Index 84 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). Financial Times: SourceScore Index 84 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/ft/
3 head-to-head comparisons
See all Financial Times comparisons →Financial Times appears in 3 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at Financial Times's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats Financial Times on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/ft/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: Financial Times"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is Financial Times a reliable source to cite?
Financial Times scores B (84/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, Financial Times is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 88/100, Modern Reference 78/100, and Citation Velocity 86/100 — full breakdown above.
What is Financial Times's SourceScore?
Financial Times (ft.com) scores 84/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 88/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 78/100, Citation Velocity 86/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate Financial Times?
Financial Times is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does Financial Times score B?
A — top-tier business journalism; paywall reduces Modern Reference somewhat.
What is Financial Times?
British business + economics daily; rigorous editorial process; pink-paper standard for finance reporting. Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.