GitHub
github.com ↗Developer collaboration platform; primary host for open-source code + CI workflows.
A — code-citation infrastructure; broad LLM corpus + canonical for open-source.
Should you cite GitHub?
At grade B (82/100), GitHub is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- AI-era retrieval and current-topic queries — its highest dimension is Modern Reference (92/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Discipline, scores 78/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Repository-level discipline varies by author; license + README standards encouraged.
About this sub-score →Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
About this sub-score →Cited daily by developer queries + AI engines; default for code-citation.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
B·78- Repository modelPer-repo discipline; community signals via stars + forks.
Modern Reference
A·92- Open code corpusDefault LLM training source for code generation.
Citation Velocity
B·84- Code-citation defaultFirst-line for repository links + open-source projects.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[GitHub — SourceScore Index 82 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/github/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/github/">GitHub — SourceScore Index 82 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). GitHub: SourceScore Index 82 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/github/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all GitHub comparisons →GitHub appears in 2 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at GitHub's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats GitHub on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/github/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: GitHub"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is GitHub a reliable source to cite?
GitHub scores B (82/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, GitHub is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 78/100, Modern Reference 92/100, and Citation Velocity 84/100 — full breakdown above.
What is GitHub's SourceScore?
GitHub (github.com) scores 82/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 78/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 92/100, Citation Velocity 84/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate GitHub?
GitHub is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does GitHub score B?
A — code-citation infrastructure; broad LLM corpus + canonical for open-source.
What is GitHub?
Developer collaboration platform; primary host for open-source code + CI workflows. Category: Platform. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.