The Guardian
theguardian.com ↗British newspaper with open-web-first publishing model; no paywall, broad LLM corpus inclusion.
A — strong all-round; open-web policy boosts Modern Reference + Velocity.
Should you cite The Guardian?
At grade A (85/100), The Guardian ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- AI-era retrieval and current-topic queries — its highest dimension is Modern Reference (86/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 84/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Editorial code public; corrections column; multi-source standard; Scott Trust ownership shields independence.
About this sub-score →No paywall = full LLM training corpus inclusion; rich Article schema; multi-language editions.
About this sub-score →Cited daily by global outlets + AI engines; strong international beat coverage.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·85- Scott TrustOwnership structure shields editorial from commercial pressure.
Modern Reference
A·86- Open-webReader-funded model keeps all content publicly retrievable.
Citation Velocity
B·84- International reachUS, UK, Australia editions; daily output ~600 stories.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[The Guardian — SourceScore Index 85 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/guardian/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/guardian/">The Guardian — SourceScore Index 85 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). The Guardian: SourceScore Index 85 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/guardian/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all The Guardian comparisons →The Guardian appears in 2 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at The Guardian's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats The Guardian on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/guardian/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: The Guardian"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is The Guardian a reliable source to cite?
The Guardian scores A (85/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, The Guardian ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 85/100, Modern Reference 86/100, and Citation Velocity 84/100 — full breakdown above.
What is The Guardian's SourceScore?
The Guardian (theguardian.com) scores 85/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 85/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 86/100, Citation Velocity 84/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate The Guardian?
The Guardian is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does The Guardian score A?
A — strong all-round; open-web policy boosts Modern Reference + Velocity.
What is The Guardian?
British newspaper with open-web-first publishing model; no paywall, broad LLM corpus inclusion. Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.