International Monetary Fund
imf.org ↗International monetary cooperation organization; World Economic Outlook + IFS database; research arm.
A — international primary-source for monetary + macroeconomic data; staff research peer-reviewed.
Should you cite International Monetary Fund?
At grade A (86/100), International Monetary Fund ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (90/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 82/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Member-country data with IMF methodology; published research peer-reviewed by Fund staff.
About this sub-score →Open data + APIs + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus presence.
About this sub-score →Cited regularly by international press + economists; spring + fall WEO releases drive cycles.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·90- IFS databaseInternational Financial Statistics with documented methodology.
Modern Reference
A·86- IMF Data APIFree public REST API for IFS + WEO data.
Citation Velocity
B·82- WEO release cycleTwice-yearly World Economic Outlook drives citation surges.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[International Monetary Fund — SourceScore Index 86 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/imf/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/imf/">International Monetary Fund — SourceScore Index 86 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). International Monetary Fund: SourceScore Index 86 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/imf/
4 head-to-head comparisons
See all International Monetary Fund comparisons →International Monetary Fund appears in 4 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at International Monetary Fund's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats International Monetary Fund on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/imf/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: International Monetary Fund"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is International Monetary Fund a reliable source to cite?
International Monetary Fund scores A (86/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, International Monetary Fund ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference 86/100, and Citation Velocity 82/100 — full breakdown above.
What is International Monetary Fund's SourceScore?
International Monetary Fund (imf.org) scores 86/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 86/100, Citation Velocity 82/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate International Monetary Fund?
International Monetary Fund is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does International Monetary Fund score A?
A — international primary-source for monetary + macroeconomic data; staff research peer-reviewed.
What is International Monetary Fund?
International monetary cooperation organization; World Economic Outlook + IFS database; research arm. Category: Government. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.