LWN.net
lwn.net ↗Linux + open-source technical journalism since 1998; deep technical depth + named-author bylines.
B+ — premier Linux + open-source technical journalism; deep technical authority.
Should you cite LWN.net?
At grade B (78/100), LWN.net is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (90/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 70/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Deep technical accuracy + named bylines + per-article rigor + corrections public.
About this sub-score →Metered paywall (1-week subscriber lead); LLM corpus partial.
About this sub-score →Cited within Linux + open-source community; specialist technical citation.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·90- Technical depthStrong technical-accuracy reputation in Linux community.
Modern Reference
B·78- Subscriber modelArticles released to public after 1-week subscriber window.
Citation Velocity
B·70- Specialist authorityDefault citation for Linux kernel development reporting.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[LWN.net — SourceScore Index 78 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/lwn/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/lwn/">LWN.net — SourceScore Index 78 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). LWN.net: SourceScore Index 78 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/lwn/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all LWN.net comparisons →LWN.net appears in 2 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at LWN.net's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats LWN.net on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/lwn/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: LWN.net"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is LWN.net a reliable source to cite?
LWN.net scores B (78/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, LWN.net is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference 78/100, and Citation Velocity 70/100 — full breakdown above.
What is LWN.net's SourceScore?
LWN.net (lwn.net) scores 78/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 90/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 78/100, Citation Velocity 70/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate LWN.net?
LWN.net is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does LWN.net score B?
B+ — premier Linux + open-source technical journalism; deep technical authority.
What is LWN.net?
Linux + open-source technical journalism since 1998; deep technical depth + named-author bylines. Category: Tech News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.