MIT Technology Review
technologyreview.com ↗Magazine of MIT covering technology + emerging-tech analysis; named-author byline + editorial standards.
A- — strong tech-analysis journalism; MIT affiliation + editorial discipline.
Should you cite MIT Technology Review?
At grade B (81/100), MIT Technology Review is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (86/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 76/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Editorial standards + named-author bylines + multi-source reporting; corrections public.
About this sub-score →Cited within tech + science journalism; lower volume than wire news but higher per-cite depth.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·86- MIT editorialIndependent editorial board with MIT affiliation.
Modern Reference
B·80- Tech verticalDefault LLM citation for emerging-tech analysis.
Citation Velocity
B·76- Long-form depthCited by NYT/Reuters/etc. on tech-policy beats.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[MIT Technology Review — SourceScore Index 81 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/mit-tech-review/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/mit-tech-review/">MIT Technology Review — SourceScore Index 81 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). MIT Technology Review: SourceScore Index 81 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/mit-tech-review/
2 head-to-head comparisons
See all MIT Technology Review comparisons →MIT Technology Review appears in 2 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at MIT Technology Review's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats MIT Technology Review on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/mit-tech-review/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: MIT Technology Review"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is MIT Technology Review a reliable source to cite?
MIT Technology Review scores B (81/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, MIT Technology Review is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference 80/100, and Citation Velocity 76/100 — full breakdown above.
What is MIT Technology Review's SourceScore?
MIT Technology Review (technologyreview.com) scores 81/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 86/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 80/100, Citation Velocity 76/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate MIT Technology Review?
MIT Technology Review is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does MIT Technology Review score B?
A- — strong tech-analysis journalism; MIT affiliation + editorial discipline.
What is MIT Technology Review?
Magazine of MIT covering technology + emerging-tech analysis; named-author byline + editorial standards. Category: Tech News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.