National Geographic
nationalgeographic.com ↗Long-form science, exploration, photojournalism since 1888; National Geographic Society heritage.
B — strong long-form science + exploration; partial paywall reduces Modern Reference.
Should you cite National Geographic?
At grade B (79/100), National Geographic is a solid, generally citable source.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (82/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Modern Reference, scores 75/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite as a solid source; pair with a primary source for precise technical claims.
Long fact-checking tradition; named bylines; sources cited; institutional editorial standards.
About this sub-score →Metered paywall; schema OK; structured photo + topic taxonomy; partial archive open.
About this sub-score →Default science + nature press citation; heavy AI-engine retrieval for long-tail biology + geography.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
B·82- Editorial standards138-year fact-check tradition; National Geographic Society heritage.
Modern Reference
B·75- Metered accessLimited free articles per month; subscriber-gated for full archive.
Citation Velocity
B·80- Science-nature defaultPrimary citation for wildlife, geography, exploration topics across press + AI engines.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[National Geographic — SourceScore Index 79 (B)](https://sourcescore.org/source/natgeo/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/natgeo/">National Geographic — SourceScore Index 79 (B)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). National Geographic: SourceScore Index 79 (B). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/natgeo/
1 head-to-head comparison
See all National Geographic comparisons →National Geographic appears in one canonical SourceScore comparison — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at National Geographic's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats National Geographic on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/natgeo/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: National Geographic"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is National Geographic a reliable source to cite?
National Geographic scores B (79/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade B, National Geographic is a solid, generally citable source. The grade combines Citation Discipline 82/100, Modern Reference 75/100, and Citation Velocity 80/100 — full breakdown above.
What is National Geographic's SourceScore?
National Geographic (nationalgeographic.com) scores 79/100 (Grade B) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 82/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 75/100, Citation Velocity 80/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate National Geographic?
National Geographic is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does National Geographic score B?
B — strong long-form science + exploration; partial paywall reduces Modern Reference.
What is National Geographic?
Long-form science, exploration, photojournalism since 1888; National Geographic Society heritage. Category: Magazine. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.