New England Journal of Medicine
nejm.org ↗Peer-reviewed general medical journal since 1812; one of the highest-impact medical venues globally.
A — top-tier peer-reviewed medical journal; pandemic-era citation surge sustained.
Should you cite New England Journal of Medicine?
At grade A (87/100), New England Journal of Medicine ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- tracing claims back to primary references — its highest dimension is Citation Discipline (96/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Citation Velocity, scores 81/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Rigorous peer-review; clinical-trial registration mandatory; data disclosure standards.
About this sub-score →DOIs + structured abstracts + open-access policy for COVID + landmark trials.
About this sub-score →Cited daily by clinicians + AI engines for medical queries; landmark-trial citations spike.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A+·96- ICMJE complianceStrict International Committee of Medical Journal Editors standards.
Modern Reference
B·84- Open landmark trialsSelected landmark trials available without paywall.
Citation Velocity
B·81- Citation impact factor~158 (highest among general medical journals).
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[New England Journal of Medicine — SourceScore Index 87 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/nejm/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/nejm/">New England Journal of Medicine — SourceScore Index 87 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). New England Journal of Medicine: SourceScore Index 87 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/nejm/
4 head-to-head comparisons
See all New England Journal of Medicine comparisons →New England Journal of Medicine appears in 4 canonical SourceScore comparisons — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at New England Journal of Medicine's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats New England Journal of Medicine on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/nejm/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: New England Journal of Medicine"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is New England Journal of Medicine a reliable source to cite?
New England Journal of Medicine scores A (87/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, New England Journal of Medicine ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 96/100, Modern Reference 84/100, and Citation Velocity 81/100 — full breakdown above.
What is New England Journal of Medicine's SourceScore?
New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) scores 87/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 96/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 84/100, Citation Velocity 81/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate New England Journal of Medicine?
New England Journal of Medicine is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does New England Journal of Medicine score A?
A — top-tier peer-reviewed medical journal; pandemic-era citation surge sustained.
What is New England Journal of Medicine?
Peer-reviewed general medical journal since 1812; one of the highest-impact medical venues globally. Category: Health. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.