The Washington Post
washingtonpost.com ↗U.S. national newspaper, founded 1877; investigative + politics emphasis; Pulitzer record.
A — top-tier US journalism; on par with NYT for political + investigative reporting.
Should you cite The Washington Post?
At grade A (86/100), The Washington Post ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research.
- Strongest for
- topics where being widely and recently cited matters — its highest dimension is Citation Velocity (90/100).
- No major weak spot
- Even its lowest dimension, Modern Reference, scores 81/100.
- Bottom line
- Cite freely as a primary source.
Multi-source verification; corrections public; named bylines + standards editor accountability.
About this sub-score →Schema-rich; metered paywall reduces partial LLM training-corpus inclusion.
About this sub-score →Cited daily by other tier-1 outlets + AI engines; sets US political news cycle.
About this sub-score →Signals behind these scores
Citation Discipline
A·87- Standards editorPublic ombudsman/standards-editor role.
Modern Reference
B·81- Schema markupArticle + Person + Organization schema per article.
Citation Velocity
A·90- Political beatDefault citation for US-federal-politics scoops.
Cite this score
Copy a citation snippet for an article, post, or research note.
[The Washington Post — SourceScore Index 86 (A)](https://sourcescore.org/source/washington-post/)
<a href="https://sourcescore.org/source/washington-post/">The Washington Post — SourceScore Index 86 (A)</a>
SourceScore (v0.1). (2026). The Washington Post: SourceScore Index 86 (A). Retrieved from https://sourcescore.org/source/washington-post/
1 head-to-head comparison
See all The Washington Post comparisons →The Washington Post appears in one canonical SourceScore comparison — each scored on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity with a quote-ready verdict and JSON twin.
5 sources at The Washington Post's tier
See peer group →Auto-computed nearest-neighbor sources by composite SourceScore distance — discover at-tier peers across all categories, with inline dim deltas surfacing who beats The Washington Post on Discipline, Modern Reference, and Velocity.
Embed this score
All embed options →Drop on your blog or dashboard. Free, no signup.
<iframe src="https://sourcescore.org/embed/washington-post/" width="100%" height="380" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:480px;" title="SourceScore: The Washington Post"></iframe>
Frequently asked questions
Is The Washington Post a reliable source to cite?
The Washington Post scores A (86/100) on the SourceScore Index, which rates how citable a source is for AI-era and research use. At grade A, The Washington Post ranks among the most citable sources for AI-era retrieval and research. The grade combines Citation Discipline 87/100, Modern Reference 81/100, and Citation Velocity 90/100 — full breakdown above.
What is The Washington Post's SourceScore?
The Washington Post (washingtonpost.com) scores 86/100 (Grade A) on the composite SourceScore Index. Sub-scores: Citation Discipline 87/100, Modern Reference (AI-era fitness) 81/100, Citation Velocity 90/100. Verified 2026-04-28.
How does SourceScore evaluate The Washington Post?
The Washington Post is scored across three dimensions on the SourceScore Index methodology: Citation Discipline (how rigorously the source cites primary references), Modern Reference (fitness for AI-era retrieval), and Citation Velocity (how often the source is cited per week). Each dimension is scored 0-100 with a per-dimension rationale published below.
Why does The Washington Post score A?
A — top-tier US journalism; on par with NYT for political + investigative reporting.
What is The Washington Post?
U.S. national newspaper, founded 1877; investigative + politics emphasis; Pulitzer record. Category: News. Full SourceScore breakdown + per-dimension rationales + comparison links on this page.