VELOCITY · 35% of composite
Ars Technica vs LWN.net — Velocity
How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.
Verdict
Ars Technica and LWN.net tie on Citation Velocity (B · 70).
Tech News
Ars Technica
arstechnica.com
B·70
Rank #114 of 130 on Velocity
Modest daily output; cited heavily within tech but not by general news.
Tech News
LWN.net
lwn.net
B·70
Rank #125 of 130 on Velocity
Cited within Linux + open-source community; specialist technical citation.
Global rank · Velocity
Why these Velocity scores
Ars TechnicaB·70
Velocity · 70/100
Modest daily output; cited heavily within tech but not by general news.
LWN.netB·70
Velocity · 70/100
Cited within Linux + open-source community; specialist technical citation.
Signals behind the Velocity score
Ars Technica
- Tech-niche~10-15 substantive posts/day; high per-piece citation in tech.
LWN.net
- Specialist authorityDefault citation for Linux kernel development reporting.
Other dimensions for Ars Technica vs LWN.net
Other Velocity comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Ars Technica (arstechnica.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — LWN.net (lwn.net) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/ars-technica-vs-lwn/velocity.json