Cochrane Library vs PubMed — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
PubMed outscores Cochrane Library on Modern Citation Reference by 12 points (A · 92 vs B · 80).
Cochrane Library
DOI per review; Crossref + ORCID; open-access in eligible countries; paywall elsewhere.
PubMed
E-utilities API + free full-text search + bulk dataset downloads; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
DOI per review; Crossref + ORCID; open-access in eligible countries; paywall elsewhere.
E-utilities API + free full-text search + bulk dataset downloads; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- Tiered accessFree in low-income countries via WHO HINARI; subscription in others.
- Entrez E-utilitiesPublic REST API for programmatic access.
Other dimensions for Cochrane Library vs PubMed
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Cochrane Library (cochranelibrary.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/cochrane-vs-pubmed/modern-reference.json