MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite
U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Department of Agriculture — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
Verdict
U.S. Food and Drug Administration outscores U.S. Department of Agriculture on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A · 92 vs A · 89).
Higher Modern Reference
Government
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
fda.gov
A·92
Rank #14 of 130 on Modern Reference
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
Government
U.S. Department of Agriculture
usda.gov
A·89
Rank #31 of 130 on Modern Reference
Quick Stats API + bulk downloads + open data; broad LLM corpus.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationA·92
Modern Reference · 92/100
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
U.S. Department of AgricultureA·89
Modern Reference · 89/100
Quick Stats API + bulk downloads + open data; broad LLM corpus.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- OpenFDA APIFree public APIs for adverse events, recalls, drug labels.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
- USDA Quick StatsFree public API for agricultural data.
Other dimensions for U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Department of Agriculture
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR