VELOCITY · 35% of composite
Financial Times vs The Economist — Velocity
How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.
Verdict
Financial Times outscores The Economist on Citation Velocity by 8 points (A · 86 vs B · 78).
Higher Velocity
News
Financial Times
ft.com
A·86
Rank #34 of 130 on Velocity
Cited daily in finance reporting; markets move on FT exclusives.
News
The Economist
economist.com
B·78
Rank #73 of 130 on Velocity
Weekly print + daily online; cited heavily in finance and policy discourse.
Global rank · Velocity
Why these Velocity scores
Financial TimesA·86
Velocity · 86/100
Cited daily in finance reporting; markets move on FT exclusives.
The EconomistB·78
Velocity · 78/100
Weekly print + daily online; cited heavily in finance and policy discourse.
Signals behind the Velocity score
Financial Times
- Finance verticalDefault citation for European markets + economics coverage.
The Economist
- Weekly cadenceSlower than wire but higher per-piece citation.
Other dimensions for Financial Times vs The Economist
Other Velocity comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Financial Times (ft.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The Economist (economist.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/ft-vs-the-economist/velocity.json