The Globe and Mail vs The New York Times — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
The New York Times outscores The Globe and Mail on Modern Citation Reference by 14 points (B · 82 vs C · 68).
The Globe and Mail
Soft paywall (metered); schema OK; English-language indexable.
The New York Times
Schema-rich; Article + Person + Organization JSON-LD; machine-readable; metered paywall reduces some training-corpus inclusion.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
Soft paywall (metered); schema OK; English-language indexable.
Schema-rich; Article + Person + Organization JSON-LD; machine-readable; metered paywall reduces some training-corpus inclusion.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- Metered accessSome free articles per month; most paywalled.
- Paywall meteringSubscription gate; partial corpus availability.
Other dimensions for The Globe and Mail vs The New York Times
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — The Globe and Mail (theglobeandmail.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The New York Times (nytimes.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/globe-and-mail-vs-nyt/modern-reference.json