Journal of the American Medical Association vs New England Journal of Medicine — Velocity
How often tier-1 publications and AI engines cite each source per week — the most volatile sub-score.
New England Journal of Medicine outscores Journal of the American Medical Association on Citation Velocity by 1 points (B · 81 vs B · 80).
Journal of the American Medical Association
Cited daily by clinicians + medical journalism; pandemic-era surge sustained.
New England Journal of Medicine
Cited daily by clinicians + AI engines for medical queries; landmark-trial citations spike.
Global rank · Velocity
Why these Velocity scores
Cited daily by clinicians + medical journalism; pandemic-era surge sustained.
Cited daily by clinicians + AI engines for medical queries; landmark-trial citations spike.
Signals behind the Velocity score
- Citation impact factor~157 (top tier of medical journals).
- Citation impact factor~158 (highest among general medical journals).
Other dimensions for Journal of the American Medical Association vs New England Journal of Medicine
Other Velocity comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Journal of the American Medical Association (jamanetwork.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/jama-vs-nejm/velocity.json