JSTOR vs Semantic Scholar — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
Semantic Scholar outscores JSTOR on Modern Citation Reference by 17 points (A · 92 vs B · 75).
JSTOR
DOI per paper; structured metadata; access tiered (institutional, individual, free archive 'JPASS').
Semantic Scholar
Free public API + bulk corpus + CC-licensed metadata; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
DOI per paper; structured metadata; access tiered (institutional, individual, free archive 'JPASS').
Free public API + bulk corpus + CC-licensed metadata; broad LLM corpus inclusion.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- Institutional gateMost content requires institutional subscription; growing free archive.
- S2 Open Research APIFree public API with full metadata + abstract.
Other dimensions for JSTOR vs Semantic Scholar
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — JSTOR (jstor.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Semantic Scholar (semanticscholar.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/jstor-vs-semantic-scholar/modern-reference.json