Ars Technica vs Hacker News — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Ars Technica outscores Hacker News on Citation Discipline by 28 points (B · 78 vs D · 50).
Ars Technica
Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.
Hacker News
Aggregator with no editorial fact-check; comments unmoderated for accuracy; flag-based community moderation.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Multi-source technical reporting; corrections public; named-author bylines + editorial accountability.
Aggregator with no editorial fact-check; comments unmoderated for accuracy; flag-based community moderation.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Named bylinesAuthor + email + bio on every article.
- No editorial layerSubmissions are external links; community votes; no editorial verification.
Other dimensions for Ars Technica vs Hacker News
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Ars Technica (arstechnica.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — Hacker News (news.ycombinator.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/ars-technica-vs-hacker-news/discipline.json