DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
BMJ Best Practice vs The Lancet — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
The Lancet outscores BMJ Best Practice on Citation Discipline by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
Health
BMJ Best Practice
bestpractice.bmj.com
A·92
Rank #47 of 130 on Discipline
Evidence-graded recommendations; references explicit; updated continuously by clinical editorial team.
Higher Discipline
Health
The Lancet
thelancet.com
A+·95
Rank #19 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
BMJ Best PracticeA·92
Discipline · 92/100
Evidence-graded recommendations; references explicit; updated continuously by clinical editorial team.
The LancetA+·95
Discipline · 95/100
Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Signals behind the Discipline score
BMJ Best Practice
- Evidence gradingGRADE methodology applied; references per claim with strength rating.
The Lancet
- Peer reviewEditor + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.
Other dimensions for BMJ Best Practice vs The Lancet
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR