The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs The Lancet — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
The Lancet outscores The BMJ (British Medical Journal) on Citation Discipline by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
The BMJ (British Medical Journal)
Peer-review + open-data policy; corrections + retractions public; investigative-rigor standard.
The Lancet
Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Peer-review + open-data policy; corrections + retractions public; investigative-rigor standard.
Peer-review enforced; methodology + data disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Open dataMandatory data-sharing for clinical trials.
- Peer reviewEditor + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.
Other dimensions for The BMJ (British Medical Journal) vs The Lancet
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — The BMJ (British Medical Journal) (bmj.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — The Lancet (thelancet.com) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/bmj-vs-the-lancet/discipline.json