U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs U.S. National Institutes of Health — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
U.S. National Institutes of Health outscores U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Modern Citation Reference by 1 points (A · 94 vs A · 93).
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
WONDER + open data + APIs; broad LLM corpus + clinical reference inclusion.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Operates PubMed + NCBI + ClinicalTrials.gov; APIs + bulk data + structured XML throughout.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
WONDER + open data + APIs; broad LLM corpus + clinical reference inclusion.
Operates PubMed + NCBI + ClinicalTrials.gov; APIs + bulk data + structured XML throughout.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- CDC WONDERPublic health data system with free API access.
- ClinicalTrials.govMandatory trial registry, machine-readable.
Other dimensions for U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — U.S. National Institutes of Health (nih.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/cdc-gov-vs-nih-gov/modern-reference.json