U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs U.S. National Institutes of Health — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. National Institutes of Health tie on Citation Discipline (A+ · 95).
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Surveillance + outbreak data subject to peer-review + ethics oversight; MMWR is the standard.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Surveillance + outbreak data subject to peer-review + ethics oversight; MMWR is the standard.
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- MMWRMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report — peer-reviewed public-health journal.
- Grant + ethics oversightHuman research subject to IRB review + federal regulations.
Other dimensions for U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — U.S. National Institutes of Health (nih.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/cdc-gov-vs-nih-gov/discipline.json