DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs U.S. National Institutes of Health — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. National Institutes of Health tie on Citation Discipline (A+ · 95).
Government
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
cdc.gov
A+·95
Rank #21 of 130 on Discipline
Surveillance + outbreak data subject to peer-review + ethics oversight; MMWR is the standard.
Government
U.S. National Institutes of Health
nih.gov
A+·95
Rank #14 of 130 on Discipline
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionA+·95
Discipline · 95/100
Surveillance + outbreak data subject to peer-review + ethics oversight; MMWR is the standard.
U.S. National Institutes of HealthA+·95
Discipline · 95/100
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Signals behind the Discipline score
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- MMWRMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report — peer-reviewed public-health journal.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
- Grant + ethics oversightHuman research subject to IRB review + federal regulations.
Other dimensions for U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vs U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR