DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Council on Foreign Relations vs Foreign Affairs — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
Foreign Affairs outscores Council on Foreign Relations on Citation Discipline by 4 points (A · 92 vs A · 88).
Research
Council on Foreign Relations
cfr.org
A·88
Rank #75 of 130 on Discipline
Named-fellow scholarship + editorial review; established think-tank standards.
Higher Discipline
Magazine
Foreign Affairs
foreignaffairs.com
A·92
Rank #37 of 130 on Discipline
Editor-supervised; named authors (typically academics or practitioners); fact-check process.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Council on Foreign RelationsA·88
Discipline · 88/100
Named-fellow scholarship + editorial review; established think-tank standards.
Foreign AffairsA·92
Discipline · 92/100
Editor-supervised; named authors (typically academics or practitioners); fact-check process.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Council on Foreign Relations
- CFR fellowsSenior fellows with disclosed expertise + credentials.
Foreign Affairs
- CFR editorialCouncil on Foreign Relations editorial-board oversight.
Other dimensions for Council on Foreign Relations vs Foreign Affairs
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR