U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission outscores U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
EDGAR APIs + machine-readable filings; broad LLM training-set inclusion via primary-source preference.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
EDGAR APIs + machine-readable filings; broad LLM training-set inclusion via primary-source preference.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- OpenFDA APIFree public APIs for adverse events, recalls, drug labels.
- EDGAR full-text searchPublic, free, machine-readable, since 1993.
Other dimensions for U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (sec.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/fda-gov-vs-sec-gov/modern-reference.json