MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite
U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
Verdict
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission outscores U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).
Government
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
fda.gov
A·92
Rank #14 of 130 on Modern Reference
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
Higher Modern Reference
Government
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
sec.gov
A+·95
Rank #2 of 130 on Modern Reference
EDGAR APIs + machine-readable filings; broad LLM training-set inclusion via primary-source preference.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationA·92
Modern Reference · 92/100
OpenFDA APIs + structured data + bulk downloads; broad LLM corpus.
U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionA+·95
Modern Reference · 95/100
EDGAR APIs + machine-readable filings; broad LLM training-set inclusion via primary-source preference.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- OpenFDA APIFree public APIs for adverse events, recalls, drug labels.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- EDGAR full-text searchPublic, free, machine-readable, since 1993.
Other dimensions for U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR