DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission outscores U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Citation Discipline by 2 points (A+ · 98 vs A+ · 96).
Government
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
fda.gov
A+·96
Rank #5 of 130 on Discipline
Statutory regulator with peer-reviewed approvals + safety-monitoring methodology.
Higher Discipline
Government
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
sec.gov
A+·98
Rank #1 of 130 on Discipline
Filings are sworn legal documents under oath; perjury liability for false statements.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Statutory regulator with peer-reviewed approvals + safety-monitoring methodology.
U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionA+·98
Discipline · 98/100
Filings are sworn legal documents under oath; perjury liability for false statements.
Signals behind the Discipline score
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Statutory authorityFederal regulator under FDCA + FSMA.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Legal weightFilers personally liable for material misstatements.
Other dimensions for U.S. Food and Drug Administration vs U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR