SourceScore
DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite

Forbes vs The Economist Discipline

How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.

Verdict

The Economist outscores Forbes on Citation Discipline by 29 points (B · 71 vs D · 42).

Business

Forbes

forbes.com
D·42
Rank #127 of 130 on Discipline

Staff articles strong; contributor articles often single-sourced or thinly edited; mixed quality undercuts domain-level rating.

Higher Discipline
News

The Economist

economist.com
B·71
Rank #115 of 130 on Discipline

Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.

Global rank · Discipline

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
Forbes
forbes.com
42D·42#127 / 130view →
The Economist
economist.com
71B·71#115 / 130view →

Why these Discipline scores

ForbesD·42
Discipline · 42/100

Staff articles strong; contributor articles often single-sourced or thinly edited; mixed quality undercuts domain-level rating.

The EconomistB·71
Discipline · 71/100

Editorial fact-check process is rigorous, but anonymity makes individual-claim provenance opaque.

Signals behind the Discipline score

Forbes
  • Contributor program
    External writers with limited editorial review on per-piece basis.
The Economist
  • House style
    Articles attributed to 'The Economist' rather than named authors.
  • Internal fact-check
    Editorial review per piece, not externally verifiable.

Other dimensions for Forbes vs The Economist

Other Discipline comparisons