SourceScore
MODERN REFERENCE · 30% of composite

GitHub vs MDN Web Docs — Modern Reference

How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.

Verdict

MDN Web Docs outscores GitHub on Modern Citation Reference by 3 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 92).

Platform

GitHub

github.com
A·92
Rank #16 of 130 on Modern Reference

Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.

Higher Modern Reference
Reference

MDN Web Docs

developer.mozilla.org
A+·95
Rank #4 of 130 on Modern Reference

Open-source content (CC-BY-SA + MIT for examples); GitHub-tracked; full structured data.

Global rank · Modern Reference

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
GitHub
github.com
92A·92#16 / 130view →
MDN Web Docs
developer.mozilla.org
95A+·95#4 / 130view →

Why these Modern Reference scores

GitHubA·92
Modern Reference · 92/100

Free APIs + bulk repo data + CC-licensed code; broad LLM corpus inclusion.

MDN Web DocsA+·95
Modern Reference · 95/100

Open-source content (CC-BY-SA + MIT for examples); GitHub-tracked; full structured data.

Signals behind the Modern Reference score

GitHub
  • Open code corpus
    Default LLM training source for code generation.
MDN Web Docs
  • Open-source docs
    github.com/mdn/content tracks every page; CC-BY-SA license.

Other dimensions for GitHub vs MDN Web Docs

Other Modern Reference comparisons

Sources & references

Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.