DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
The Globe and Mail vs The Times (UK) — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
The Globe and Mail and The Times (UK) tie on Citation Discipline (B · 82).
News
The Globe and Mail
theglobeandmail.com
B·82
Rank #97 of 130 on Discipline
Strong editorial standards, named bylines, public corrections, fact-check process.
News
The Times (UK)
thetimes.co.uk
B·82
Rank #96 of 130 on Discipline
Long fact-check tradition; named bylines; corrections public; some opinion-news drift noted.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
The Globe and MailB·82
Discipline · 82/100
Strong editorial standards, named bylines, public corrections, fact-check process.
The Times (UK)B·82
Discipline · 82/100
Long fact-check tradition; named bylines; corrections public; some opinion-news drift noted.
Signals behind the Discipline score
The Globe and Mail
- Canadian press councilAdheres to National NewsMedia Council standards.
The Times (UK)
- Editorial standardsIPSO-regulated; long history of corrections discipline.
Other dimensions for The Globe and Mail vs The Times (UK)
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR