Mayo Clinic vs U.S. National Institutes of Health — Modern Reference
How fit each source is for citation in modern (LLM-era) writing — machine-readability, schema, freshness signals, AI-corpus presence.
U.S. National Institutes of Health outscores Mayo Clinic on Modern Citation Reference by 9 points (A · 94 vs A · 85).
Mayo Clinic
Schema.org MedicalCondition + MedicalProcedure markup; open access; structured.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Operates PubMed + NCBI + ClinicalTrials.gov; APIs + bulk data + structured XML throughout.
Global rank · Modern Reference
Why these Modern Reference scores
Schema.org MedicalCondition + MedicalProcedure markup; open access; structured.
Operates PubMed + NCBI + ClinicalTrials.gov; APIs + bulk data + structured XML throughout.
Signals behind the Modern Reference score
- Medical schemaMedicalCondition / MedicalProcedure / Drug schema applied per page.
- ClinicalTrials.govMandatory trial registry, machine-readable.
Other dimensions for Mayo Clinic vs U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Modern Reference comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Mayo Clinic (mayoclinic.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — U.S. National Institutes of Health (nih.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/mayo-clinic-vs-nih-gov/modern-reference.json