Mayo Clinic vs U.S. National Institutes of Health — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
U.S. National Institutes of Health outscores Mayo Clinic on Citation Discipline by 7 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 88).
Mayo Clinic
Physician-reviewed patient information; review dates visible; HONcode certified.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
Physician-reviewed patient information; review dates visible; HONcode certified.
Federally-funded research subject to grant + ethics oversight; ClinicalTrials.gov registration required for human studies.
Signals behind the Discipline score
- Physician reviewEvery page reviewed + signed by named MD/DO; review date visible.
- Grant + ethics oversightHuman research subject to IRB review + federal regulations.
Other dimensions for Mayo Clinic vs U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Discipline comparisons
Sources & references
Every score on this page is read from the two publications below and graded against the published rubric. No score is bought, estimated or supplied by the source being scored.
- Source evaluated — Mayo Clinic (mayoclinic.org) · verified · full scoring record
- Source evaluated — U.S. National Institutes of Health (nih.gov) · verified · full scoring record
- Scoring rubric — SourceScore Index, Citation Discipline, Modern Reference, Citation Velocity (methodology v0.1)
- Machine-readable record — /api/compare/mayo-clinic-vs-nih-gov/discipline.json