DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
Nature vs PNAS — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
PNAS outscores Nature on Citation Discipline by 1 points (A+ · 96 vs A+ · 95).
Academic
Nature
nature.com
A+·95
Rank #13 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
Higher Discipline
Academic
PNAS
pnas.org
A+·96
Rank #9 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-reviewed by NAS members; rigorous review across all sciences; corrections + retractions public.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
NatureA+·95
Discipline · 95/100
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retraction watch active.
PNASA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Peer-reviewed by NAS members; rigorous review across all sciences; corrections + retractions public.
Signals behind the Discipline score
Nature
- Peer reviewEditorial + ≥2 reviewer cycles before publication.
- Open data policyMandatory data deposit for empirical papers since 2016.
PNAS
- NAS-affiliated peer reviewThree-track review (NAS member, contributed, direct submission); standardized rigor.
Other dimensions for Nature vs PNAS
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR