SourceScore
DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite

The New York Times vs ProPublica — Discipline

How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.

Verdict

ProPublica outscores The New York Times on Citation Discipline by 7 points (A+ · 95 vs A · 88).

News

The New York Times

nytimes.com
A·88
Rank #67 of 130 on Discipline

Multi-source verification; fact-check + corrections processes public; named bylines + editor accountability.

Higher Discipline
News

ProPublica

propublica.org
A+·95
Rank #15 of 130 on Discipline

Methodology + raw data published alongside most stories; fact-checked; corrections public.

Global rank · Discipline

SourceScoreGradeRankDetail
The New York Times
nytimes.com
88A·88#67 / 130view →
ProPublica
propublica.org
95A+·95#15 / 130view →

Why these Discipline scores

The New York TimesA·88
Discipline · 88/100

Multi-source verification; fact-check + corrections processes public; named bylines + editor accountability.

ProPublicaA+·95
Discipline · 95/100

Methodology + raw data published alongside most stories; fact-checked; corrections public.

Signals behind the Discipline score

The New York Times
  • Public corrections
    Daily corrections column dating back decades.
  • Editor accountability
    Public editor / standards editor roles.
ProPublica
  • Methodology-published model
    Each major investigation links to methodology + raw datasets.

Other dimensions for The New York Times vs ProPublica

SourceScore Index
Composite head-to-head — The New York Times leads
Modern Reference
ProPublica +2 pts
Velocity
The New York Times +14 pts

Other Discipline comparisons

Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR