DISCIPLINE · 35% of composite
PNAS vs Science — Discipline
How rigorously each source backs its factual claims with verifiable evidence.
Verdict
PNAS outscores Science on Citation Discipline by 1 points (A+ · 96 vs A+ · 95).
Higher Discipline
Academic
PNAS
pnas.org
A+·96
Rank #9 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-reviewed by NAS members; rigorous review across all sciences; corrections + retractions public.
Academic
Science
science.org
A+·95
Rank #16 of 130 on Discipline
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retractions public.
Global rank · Discipline
Why these Discipline scores
PNASA+·96
Discipline · 96/100
Peer-reviewed by NAS members; rigorous review across all sciences; corrections + retractions public.
ScienceA+·95
Discipline · 95/100
Peer-review enforced; data + code disclosure increasingly mandatory; retractions public.
Signals behind the Discipline score
PNAS
- NAS-affiliated peer reviewThree-track review (NAS member, contributed, direct submission); standardized rigor.
Science
- AAAS publisherIndependent peer-review managed by editorial board + reviewers.
Other dimensions for PNAS vs Science
Other Discipline comparisons
Wikipedia (English) vs Encyclopædia BritannicaThe New York Times vs The Washington PostAssociated Press vs ReutersFinancial Times vs The Wall Street JournalNature vs ScienceNew England Journal of Medicine vs The LancetarXiv vs PubMedDOI (CrossRef Resolver) vs Semantic ScholarForeign Affairs vs The EconomistBBC News vs The GuardianAl Jazeera English vs BBC NewsBBC News vs NPR